Page 106 - Anuario AC/E de cultura digital 2018

106
32. Jhala, A., Young, R. M.: «Cinematic visual discourse: representation, generation, and evaluation». IEEE Trans. Comput. Int. AI Games 2(2), pp. 69-81 (2010).
33. Klein, S., Aeschliman, J. F., Balsiger, D. F., Converse, S. L., Court, C., Foster, M., Lao, R., Oakley, J. D., Smith, J.: Automatic novel writing: a status report. Technical Report 186, Computer Science Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin (1973).
34. Lareau, F., Dras, M., Dale, R.: «Detecting in- teresting event sequences for sports reporting». En: Proceedings of ENLG, pp. 200-205 (2011).
35. León, C., Gervás, P.: «A top-down design methodology based on causality and chronology for developing assisted story generation sys- tems». En: 8th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition, Atlanta (2011).
38. Manurung, H. M.: «Chart generation of rhythm-patterned text». En: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Literature in Cognition and Computers (1999).
39. Manurung, H. M.: An evolutionary algorithm approach to poetry generation. Tesis doctoral, University of Edinburgh, Edimburgo, UK (2003).
40. Meehan, J. R.: «Tale-spin, an interactive program that writes stories». En: Proceedings of IJCAI, pp. 91-98 (1977).
41. OuLiPo: Atlas de littérature potentielle. Collec- tion Idées, vol. 1. Gallimard (1981).
43. Peinado, F.: Un armazón para el desarrollo de aplicaciones de narración automática basado en componentes ontológicos reutilizables. Tesis doctoral, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid (2008).
44. Propp, V.: Morphology of the Folktale. Univer- sity of Texas Press, Austin (1968).
45. Queneau, R.: 100.000.000.000.000 de poèmes. Gallimard Series. Schoenhof’s Foreign Books (1961).
48. Rashel, F., Manurung, R.: «Pemuisi: a cons- traint satisfaction-based generator of topical Indonesian poetry». En: 5th International Con- ference on Computational Creativity, ICCC 2014, Liubliana, Eslovenia (2014).
49. Riedl, M. O., Michael Young, R.: «Narrative planning: balancing plot and character». J. Artif. Int. Res. 39(1), pp. 217-268 (2010).
51. Mike Sharples. How We Write: Writing As Creative Design, Routledge (1999).
52. Toivanen, J. M., Gross, O., Toivonen, H.: «The officer is taller than you, who race yourself! Using document specific word associations in poetry generation». En: 5th International Con- ference on Computational Creativity, ICCC 2014, Liubliana, Eslovenia (2014).
53. Toivanen, J. M., Järvisalo, M., Toivonen, H.: «Harnessing constraint programming for poetry composition». En: Proceedings of the Internatio- nal Conference on Computational Creativity, pp. 160-167 (2013).
54. Toivanen, J. M., Toivonen, H., Valitutti, A., Gross, O.: «Corpus-based generation of content and form in poetry». En: Proceedings of the Inter- national Conference on Computational Creativity, pp. 175-179 (2012).
55. Turner, S. R.: Minstrel: a computer model of creativity and storytelling. Tesis doctoral, Uni- versity of California at Los Angeles, Los Ángeles (1993).
56. Veale, T.: «Less rhyme, more reason: Knowledge-based poetry generation with feeling, insight and wit». En: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Creativity, pp. 152-159 (2013).
LA CREATIVIDAD COMPUTACIONAL COMO FRONTERA DE LA INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL... · PABLO GERVÁS
Tendencias digitales para la cultura